Flu Vaccine Study Reveals It To Be Quack Science...

Research Proves That Flu Shots Are Medically Useless

October 21, 2012

Dr. Walter K. Crooks, DC,

Member of the Pastoral Medical Association

Have you been waiting in line to get that needle full of Animal DNA, Human Fetal Tissue From Abortions, Mercury Formaldehyde and many more lovely, life improving ingredients? 

Well you may want to read this post first….

A recent study out of the University of Minnesota (UM) suggests that it isn’t necessary, having found that the two groups most at risk from developing serious complications from the flu, seniors and children, derive little or no benefit from getting flu shots.

Michael Osterholm from the UM Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy analyzed more than 12,000 peer-reviewed studies, documents, transcripts, and notes dating back to the 1930s, and found that there was very little solid evidence that the flu shot provides any real protection for most people.

"We found that current influenza vaccine protection is substantially lower than for most routine recommended vaccines and is suboptimal…we can no longer accept the status quo regarding vaccine research and development." said Osterholm about the findings.”

In Osterholm's opinion, a flu shot should ideally be between 85 and 95 percent effective in all age groups before ever being considered effective and useful. This means that the types of flu shots currently administered to hundreds of millions of Americans every single year are COMPLETE MEDICAL QUACKERY.

Yet even this researcher manipulates the numbers to get results. (Can You Say Unethical?!?!),  He claims efficacy in 60% of those vaccinated, but the facts tell otherwise, as do his own numbers.

When taken in the light of the research that was used for this studies' research, the efficacy associated with influenza vaccine is negligible at best.

In a major study published in Lancet 2011, which involved 13,095 non-vaccinated adults who were monitored to see if they caught influenza, which 357 of them did, in fact, contract influenza resulting in 2.7% infection rate.

The vaccinated group, on the other hand, had an overall infection rate of 1.2%.

So even if you believe this study, and even if you believe all the pro-vaccine hype behind it, the truly "scientific" conclusion from this is rather astonishing:

Flu vaccines only prevent the flu in 1.5 out of every 100 adults injected with the vaccine!

So where does this "60% effective" come from?

This is know as “Statistical Manipulation", and it's an old statistical trick that the vaccine industry (and the pharmaceutical industry) uses over and over again to trick people into thinking their useless drugs actually work.

First, you take the 2.7% in the control group who got the flu, and you divide that into the 1.2% in the treatment group who got the flu. This gives you roughly 0.45.
You can then say that 0.45 is "45% of 2.7," and claim that the vaccine therefore results in a "60% decrease" in influenza infections. This then becomes a "60% effectiveness rate" claim.

The overall "60% effectiveness" being claimed from this study comes from adding additional data about vaccine efficacy for children, which returned higher numbers than adults. 

There were other problems with the data for children, however, including one study that showed an increase in influenza rates in the second year after the flu shot.

So when the media (or your doctor, or pharmacist, or CDC official) says these vaccines are "60% effective," this, to the average person, means that of 100 vaccinated people, 60 of them will not get the flu.

However, as you have seen, this is not the case, if you were to 100 adults then 1.5 of them would avoid getting the flu.

In other words, to prevent 60 people from getting the flu a total of 4,000 people would have to be immunized!

Or, put another way, flu vaccines do nothing in 98.5% of adults.

But you've probably already noticed that the mainstream media won't dare print this statistical revelation. They would much rather mislead everybody into the utterly false and ridiculous belief that flu vaccines are "60% effective," whatever that means.

As for children and flu shots, well the evidence is lacking at best and what is spewed by those that profit from these vaccines is just parroted from what they have been told or seen, because if they would just read some research they would know things such as: A systematic review of 51 studies involving 260,000 children age 6 to 23 months found no evidence that the flu vaccine is any more effective than a placebo (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;1:CD004879).

How To “Cook The Books” With Statistics!

This little statistical lying technique is very popular in the cancer industry, too, where these "relative numbers" are used to lie about all sorts of drugs.

You may have heard, for example, that a breast cancer drug is "50% effective at preventing breast cancer!"

 But what does that really mean? It could mean that 2 women out of 100 got breast cancer in the control group, and only 1 woman out of 100 got it in the treatment group. Thus, the drug is only shown to work on 1 out of 100 women. 

But since 1 is 50% of 2, they will spin the store and claim a "50% breast cancer prevention rate!"

And most consumers will buy into this because they don't understand how the medical industry lies with these statistics. So they will think to themselves, "Wow, if I take this medication, there is a 50% chance this will prevent breast cancer for me!"

And yet that's utterly false. In fact, there is only a 1% chance it will prevent breast cancer for you, according to the study.

 Real Protection From The Flu…

Become Pro-Active with your health! Eat more organic fruits and vegetables, especially green leafy veggies, supplement with garlic, colloidal silver, plenty of B vitamins, get plenty of good quality sleep every night and drink plenty of purified, mineral-rich water.

These are just some of the highly effective ways to naturally avoid the flu without risking potentially deadly side effects.

-->

http://LifeChangingCareHouston.com

Life-Changing Care FaceBook Page 

Follow Us On Twitter! 

Resources: http://www.naturalnews.com/037620_flu_vaccines_effectiveness_exaggerations.html#ixzz29wn0Fb27

-->

Study Results Say To Take Your Vitamins And Prevent Cancer

-->

Vitamins Lower Cancer Risk in Men!

October 18, 2012

By: Dr. Walter K. Crooks, DC, DM (P.), CCCN

In a cancer study that spanned 17 years and included 14,641 male participants who were 50 years of age or over, it was found that men that take multivitamins had a decreased cancer rate of 8% and reduced the deaths associated with cancer by a whopping 12%.

130,000 Lives Potentially Saved!

These numbers a statistically significant, especially knowing that more than 1.6 million new cancer cases are diagnosed in the U.S. each year, this translates into about 130,000 cancers being prevented every year!

The study has been published in the Journal of the American Medical Association to coincide with the Annual American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research meeting.

I can remember the time when MD’s stated for fact that vitamin supplementation does nothing to increase the health of a person unless they have a deficiency, as measured by what they determine a deficiency entails.

Even now there are many MD’s that refuse to accept the fact, a fact that holistic health care providers have known all along, that people are not cloned and exact copies of one another, we are all as varied as the snowflake.

To look at the human as a collection of separate parts that have been assembled, and to treat in that manner is no different than being a auto diagnostician, checking each system of a car and repairing them as they are located.

If people would sit back and think for a second how it is to visit their own doctor they will see a pattern that is usually the same for everyone:

You go in they give you a drug that has been shown to ameliorate your symptoms. If that drug doesn’t do the trick then the MD answers with another drug to try out.

It is what I refer to as the “Spit-Balling” method of health care; meaning let’s shoot stuff at you see what sticks…

That’s not science; heck it’s not even as skilled as your local auto mechanic’s analysis of your vehicle!

It is becoming more and more apparent that the medical community has missed the boat whenever it comes to Chronic Health Conditions such as cancer.

Americans make up 5% of the world’s population, however we consume 47% of all the drugs produced worldwide!

You would think, if you follow the medical establishments propaganda, that we would rank 1^st in the world for healthcare!

Well, don’t shoot the messenger but:

The U.S. Ranks 37^th In The World!

How can this be the case if we are taking our medications?

Americans Are Very Well Medicated, See For Yourself:

• 11% of adults aged 18-65 are on 5 medications!
• 21% of adults aged 18-65 are on 3 medications!
• 25% of children are on at least one medication!
• 37% of seniors are on 5 medications!
• 52% of women in the U.S. are on at least 1 medication!
• 65% of seniors are on 3 medications!            
• 90% of all seniors in America are taking at least one medication!

Study after study proves that the Holistic Health Care Model is the true path to living a healthy life.

The holistic, natural and hands on approach to health has as its base a goal of disease prevention!

On the other hand, allopathic, chemically engineered and un-natural “health care” has as it’s base disease management!  (if you would call it that)

A more fitting term for the American health care model would be “Monopolized Sickness Profit Care-less”, a program of keeping us alive but just sick enough and often enough to rely on their chemicals and death causing drugs.

You see no medication really has a side effect.

All Medication Have EFFECTS, Period.

The effect may rid your body of an infection, or the effect of the drug may be that you die……

Take your vitamins!

 http://LifeChangingCareHouston.com

Life-Changing Care FaceBook Page 

Follow Us On Twitter! 

"Why in the World are They Spraying?" Could Monsanto Gain Financially?

I must admit, whenever I would read a post about someone suggesting that people start to set up seed storage  units in their homes and also water storage systems, I thought they were "Nutbags"!

However, over the past few months, as I have read and watched different things on this subject of global control of our environment/agriculture/life, from these scientist, government officials, and documentary producers, it is apparent, to me, that something is amiss.

The evidence that has been accumulated is overwhelmingly supportive of the facts in this and other films and papers, that someone is spraying something out of airplanes on a daily basis, in vast quantities.

I am no "Tree Hugger" and I think, for the most part, that people like Congressman Dennis Kucinich are socially liberal fools, but even these "fools"  do bring valid concerns to the people.

There should be no question as to my feelings on GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms)  food and that it should not be grown, much less consumed by any living, breathing animal.

I have now, after doing my own research of the research, combined with what I have seen and heard from those that are in the "In The Know" positions of society, that there is a collaborative effort to cause our soil to become more and more acidic.

Your first question may be "how?" Well by spraying chemicals and metals such as aluminum, barium and strontium into the atmosphere, under the pretense of cooling the earth, but in fact, these metals, when oxidized as they inevitably do in the soil, cause the pH to change.

Now what would that have to do with GMO crops you may ask. Well, if a soil is naturally at a certain pH  and this is the state that crops must have to grow and thrive,  the pH then becomes altered in a matter of days/weeks/months/years, well those plants that once thrived in a certain type of pH environment will no longer do so.

At that point companies such as Monsanto step in and exclaim "Hey, we just so happen to have some of that plants' seed that just so happens to have been modified to be able to resist aluminum/barium/strontium and other metals and also, by coincidence, thrive in soil with an acidic pH." 

At that point what choice would you have? Company M owns the only seed that lives in the unnatural but predominant soil of the earth and you need to feed your children and let us not forget that you also depend upon the money that is earned by selling your crop, well you are in a position of no choice, you must buy what Company M is selling at a price that Company M has set, a price that the patent owners set without competitive free market control! (Now all together....say it with me....Monopoly!)

You may think I have fallen off the crazy truck, but let me assure you that if you will spend a few hours and peruse the internet for the patents that have been applied for within the US Patent system for seeds that just so happen to grow in this type of soil, a soil that, until the last few decades or so ago, did not exist in the overwhelming majority of the earths surface yet now is becoming more and more the soil of the land, well, in my opinion, you can come to no other conclusion than the following: This is a GREED for NEED of higher PROFIT that is driving the destructive adulteration of the environment with the full support, backing, and in COLLUSION with our own government along with our NATO counterparts. 

Why else would a huge company devise a seed that, at the time in which that seed was developed, would not have been marketable at all,  but lo and behold, 15 or more years later, by some chance evolutionary gaffe, the soil has morphed into the type of soil in which  that particular seed would grow undeterred and the natural crop begins to die off because of the soil's pH!

It is as if companies such as Monsanto had a crystal ball decades ago and could see that the earth would suddenly begin to change her soil's pH, in the process destroying the crops that depended upon that soil, a crop whose seed was once abundantly cheap and without patented ownership!

Due to the exceptional and other-worldly foresight with which these companies were able to predict this unnatural and chaotic shift of soil pH,  Monsanto and others like them,  will be in the position to step in and save the world from famine by offering their patented, profit driven Frankenseed, whose price doesn't depend upon market variants or supply-demand models of free enterprise because the different corporations that own the seed have a monopoly on the raw product, the various crop seed,  that is at the core of the agricultural global market economy. A monopoly fully insured by out government's willing participation.

The Monsanto's of the world will make out like bandits at a expense of our children and their children's children's health.

Please do not allow the greed and power-hungry of the world ruin what God has given to us for our sustenance and livelihood. 

Are we not as the three servants in the Book Of Matthew that were called by their master to take care of His belongings while he was away? Two of the servants did as instructed and nurtured and cared for the gold by investing it for their Master for a profit, whom, upon His return, showed them appreciation for their obediance by offering them a share in His riches.

When the third servant explained that he did not watch after the Masters gold, but instead buried it rendering it unproductive, the Master ordered the servant to be thrown out to the place where the people wail and gnash their teeth.

Please watch this film and pass this blog post on to everyone in your contact list!

"LIKE" Us on FaceBook 
Life-Changing Care of Texas  
Follow Us On Twitter 

Common Infection Often Misdiagnosed In Americans!

-->

The Deadly Dangers Of The Intestinal Parasite, Strongyloides.

Study published: Clinical and Molecular Allergy 2006, 4:8

By: Dr. Walter K. Crooks

October 13, 2012

Strongyloides are tiny parasitic worms that like to dine on humans.  

People with Strongyloidiasis have the worms until they die, unless they
 receive effective treatment. The worm may persist for 40 years or more in the small intestine, and it can also be spread as a sexually transmitted disease.

Stronglyoidiasis is fairly common in America, however it is not often diagnosed because, if chronic, the symptoms are mostly mild or mistaken for some other disease process.  In a great many instances, people found infested with strongyloides have
 usually been infested for years, even decades before being diagnosed and treated.

An infection of strongyloides can be difficult to eradicate completely mainly because of the specialized ability of these worms to autoinfect their host.

Strongyloides are unique and dangerous because of the following specialized characteristic features they employ:

 

1.    Autoinfection: This is an important characteristic feature of this worms life cycle. Upon penetrating the intestinal wall or skin around the anus, the larvae enter the bloodstream and reach the pulmonary circulation.

They then penetrate into the lung tissue’s membrane so that they may do one of two things:

a)   Become airborne to infect others.

b)   Travel up the bronchial tree, causing irritation, which in turn causes the infected person to cough thus allowing for the larva to be swallowed into the gastrointestinal tract to begin the infection process all over again.

2.    Hyper-infection: The hyper-infection syndrome happens when there is an enormous multiplication and migration of infective larvae. This especially happens to a person that is in an immunosuppressed state, such as patients that are on long-term corticosteroids.

Symptoms include mainly asthma-like complaints such as cough and wheezing, along with possible pneumonia and pulmonary hemorrhage.

Rare conditions like eosinophilic pleural effusions and eosinophilic granulomatous enterocolitis have also been reported in strongyloidiasis.

One factor that has been attributed to these sudden parasite population explosions is the chronic use of immunosuppressive drugs like, systemic corticosteroids (cortisol, hydrocortisone), organ transplants and other infections such as kala-azar.

3.    Disseminated Infection: In patients that are taking immunosuppressant drugs such as exogenous cortisol (hydrocortisone), Fatal Disseminated Infections are known to occur.

In patients that are malnourished or have been victims of chronic infections, there is an 87% chance of death with this infection.

The high mortality rate associated with hyper-infection syndrome and disseminated diseases are frequently due to a secondary bacterial infection.

Corticosteroids and Strongyloidiasis

Multiple case reports indicate a potential increase in the frequency of fatal hyper-infection or disseminated infection with corticosteroid therapy in patients with asymptomatic or mild strongyloidiasis.

Corticosteroids have been shown to affect a patients immunity by increasing the apoptosis (programed cell death) of immune system Th2 cells, reducing the eosinophil count and inhibiting the mast cell response which leads to hyperinfection or disseminated infection.

It is also believed that corticosteroid therapy increases ecdysteroid like substances (these are naturally occurring sterols with non-hormonal anabolic effects) in the body, mainly in the intestinal wall.

Unfortunately, when these steroids are in the presence of the stronglyoides worm they produce substances that act as a molting (reproduction) signal to the larvae, which leads to hyperinfection and disseminated infections.

Research conducted by Siddiqui et al., has found that there are corticosteroid receptors on Strongyloides. These receptors could also play a role in hyperinfection syndrome along with the systemic disseminated infection associated with corticosteroids.

Conclusion

Strongyloidiasis is a nematode infection with a tendency to become chronic with fatal complications of hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated infection along with a host of other potential complications like gram-negative bacteremia and meningitis.

Due to the fact that most cases of hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated strongyloidiasis happen in immuno-compromised individuals, especially those who are taking systemic corticosteroids, like hydrocortisone, physicians should be aware of the bizarre manifestations of the disease that can mimic other diseases leading to misdiagnosis and medical errors.

If you or someone you know are infected with the Strongyloides nematode and are taking corticosteroides (hydrocortisone, ect. ), it is imperative that you speak to your physician at once and ask that they review the facts associated with Strongyloidiasis and hydrocortisone therapy.

In health,

Dr. Walter K. Crooks

http://brainbasedtherapy.blogspot.com/

http://lifechangingcarehouston.com/

https://www.facebook.com/LifeChangingCareHouston

Ginger: The Cancer Slaying Herb!

-->

Ginger: The Cancer Slaying Herb!

Shhhhh…. Don’t let the American Cancer Society know about the findings of this study and the possible natural cure for breast cancer it found…it would disrupt their fund raising!

Every year since 1938 the number 2 killer of all Americans has been Cancer!

A research paper published in Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology has found that extracts of the herb Ginger kill cancer cells! The researchers note in their paper that in spite of the high global death toll of breast cancer, conventional drug therapies are modestly effective at best, often with serious side effects that include causing new and more aggressive cancers.

Ginger extract may prove to be more effective at fighting breast cancer than any drug on the market!

"Despite significant advances toward targeted therapy and screening techniques, breast cancer continues to be a chronic medical problem worldwide, being the most common type of cancer in women and the leading cause of death," they write.

"Typically, the treatment of breast cancer involves hormonal therapy with ... selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulators. However, almost all patients with metastatic disease and approximately 40 percent of patients that receive [the ER modulator] Tamoxifen experience relapse that ends by death!"

The researchers also note that ER antagonists have little to no effectiveness against ER-negative breast cancer, and that the drugs may have such severe side effects that their usefulness is severely limited.

In addition, many breast cancer cells are able to develop resistance to cancer drugs within the course of a single treatment.

"Thus, identification of novel agents that are relatively safe but can suppress growth of both ER-positive and ER-negative human breast cancers is highly desirable," they write.

Could This Be A Safe & Natural Treatment?

The researchers exposed breast cancer cells in the laboratory to an extract of ginger (Zingiber officinale). They found that ginger exhibited a highly prized anti-cancer trait known as selective cytotoxicity: It inhibited the reproduction of cancer cells while leaving healthy cells unaffected. 

 No conventional cancer treatment on the market exhibits this property!

Noted findings include the ability of ginger to positively modulated a large number of molecular anti-cancer mechanisms, these include:

• Induction of programmed cell death (apoptosis).
• Up-regulation of BAX, an apoptosis gene
• Down-regulation of numerous cancer-associated genes and proteins
• Increased expression of cancer-fighting proteins.
• Inhibition of cancer-associated enzymes.

Although the researchers were not able to explain these molecular effects, the evidence in their favor was striking.
"Ginger may be a promising candidate for the treatment of breast carcinomas," the researchers concluded.

Ginger - A Medicinal Powerhouse!

If further studies show ginger's utility as a breast cancer treatment, it could revolutionize the entire field of cancer medicine, since ginger extract could easily be produced cheaply and in large quantities and it’s use would have little to know side effects.

Previous studies have already shown ginger to have a breast cancer-fighting effect. More specifically, ginger compound [6]-Gingerol inhibits metastasis of breast cancer cells. Other studies have suggested that ginger extract or ginger components have the ability to fight other cancers, including

• Colon
• Rectum
• Liver
• Lungs
• Pancreas
• Prostate
• Skin (including Malignant Melanoma).

These findings should not be surprising; ginger is one of the oldest known medicinal foods. It’s origin appears to have been in southern China, it then rapidly spread throughout Asia to the Spice Islands and from there, eventually to West Africa, the Caribbean and India. Today it is widely consumed as a food, spice and medicine in cultures across the globe.

Scientific Studies Have Linked Ginger To No Fewer Than 100 Different Health Benefits!

Including its most well known usage as an anti-nausea and digestive aid, it is also a potent anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory and is a powerful health-promoting herb for the heart and cardiovascular system. Ginger is used for many disease processes.

  "The greatest kindness one can render to any man consists in leading him from error to truth."   

-- St. Thomas Aquinas

In Health,

Dr. Walter K. Crooks

Chiropractic Clinical Neurologist

http://lifechangingcarehouston.com/

https://www.facebook.com/LifeChangingCareHouston/

Sources include:

http://www.naturalnews.com/037503_ginger_breast_cancer_treatment.html/